Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Aggregation vs. plagiarism

Interesting New York Times article about Germany's attempts to protect and enforce the copyright of journalism that appears online. Unfortunately, it's a little skimpy on the details. As someone whose work has been plagiarized, I support the idea of clamping down on plagiarism, especially when people are making money through this unethical and illegal behavior. But I'm a little foggy on why publishers want the term "plagiarist" to apply to news feeds.

News feeds generally provide the title of an article and the first few sentences, then direct the reader to the Web site that originally published the article. What's the problem here? How is this substantially different from a library's book index?

If an aggregator reproduces the article in its entirety, that's a problem. But I have a hard time calling such a service an aggregator. It's really a publication of its own that uses aggregation technology to provide its content. You know, a "plagiarggregator." Don't you love how that flows off the tongue?

Repeat that word without attributing it to me, and I'll sue you!*

*Unless, of course, your use is in line with Fair Use laws, in which case I'll be proud of how my difficult-to-pronounce coinage is invading the English language.

Calling me unconventional

You call me unconventional, and say it like I made a conscious choice to reject your conventions. No, I didn't. I don't even understand what your conventions are. If you took the time to explain them to me, then I could make the conscious decision to reject them. But you haven't, so I haven't.

Really, if you knew the conventions I've chosen to live by, and by which I wish others would live, you would see that I am utterly conventional.

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

When there's no more room in Hell ...

Thanks to Fake AP Stylebook, which instigated my laugh of the day with this Oct. 30th addition to its e-edition: "When there's no more room in Hell, omit the final paragraphs to save space."

Manners

I think good manners are very important. But I think my notion of what is polite separates me from most of the U.S. population.

For example, there is the class of people who think it is the height of rudeness to touch someone else's stuff without asking, unless that someone is a close friend with whom you have an agreement that doing so is okay.

Then there is the class of people who think that someone who doesn't want others to touch their things without asking is a selfish bitch or bastard.

I fall into the former category, but when I am at work, I feel myself to be in the distinct minority.

One of my co-workers is a particularly egregious toucher. Today he was in my office when my microwave popcorn popper caught his eye. But he couldn't simply ask me about it. No. He had to reach up to the shelf where I keep it, take it down, and gesture with it in his hand as he asked me about it. (Did I mention that this thing is made of glass?)

We have had this discussion before, so I cut to the chase. "I don't remember you asking me if you could touch that," I said. (In my camp, sarcasm isn't as rude as touching other people's things, but I know not everyone agrees with me.)

"No, I didn't," he said, and continued to manhandle it.

Back when I worked with a bunch of hippie types, the way we were supposed to bring up how we wanted to be treated was by saying, "I feel ___ when ____ happens. It reminds me of ____. In the future, I would feel more comfortable if we handled the situation this way: ________."

Maybe I should try it with this co-worker, but I'm not sure it would be any more effective than sarcasm. "I feel violated when people touch my things without asking. It reminds me of all the selfish prigs who have touched my things without asking - for example, that guy who ruined my cycling gloves by trying them on even though his hands are twice as big as mine, or the boss who picked up my pen while holding a used Kleenex in the same hand. But more important than reminding me of anything, such behavior is inimical to my understanding of how people ought to interact with one another. Individuals ought to have some degree of autonomy, and they ought to be free to decide whom to allow into their personal realm. When you touch what belongs to someone else, you are entering the personal realm. In the future, I would feel more comfortable if we handled the situation this way: please ask if you want to touch my things, and respect 'no' for an answer. I work with you; I am not obligated to be your buddy. And the more you impose buddiness on our relationship, the more I will think you are rude and the less likely I am to become your friend."

I guess that sounds meaner than what I actually said, since in our culture people tend to get offended if you state the obvious fact that you are not their friend. It's okay to know it, just not to say it.

Just like it's okay to know that there's something discordant about people who believe they're destined for heaven still fighting like hell to defeat a terminal illness, but it's not considered polite to point this out to them.

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Country says goodbye to McDonald's

Alas, it's not my country.

Iceland's McDonald's franchisee could no longer afford to import all the ingredients for products sold at the country's three outlets. So he's converting the restaurants to his own brand and sourcing local ingredients for the food he'll sell there. I don't know if that means more lamb burgers and fewer hamburgers, but if it does, cool -- I'll try them the next time I'm in Iceland.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

The fires of hell

Spanish farmers have succeeded in transforming a wetland into a place so dry that a fire has started underground. Didn't think fires could burn underground? Yeah, talk to Lucifer.

(Oh, and on a completely different note, I recently learned that Mormon/Latter Day Saints cosmology-theology teaches that Jesus and Lucifer were brothers. Then I realized I should have figured this out long ago since the Church teaches that all humans, angels and fallen angels spent their first life as the spirit children of God the Father. I am so disappointed in my powers of deduction!)

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

So ... incredibly ... bored